Janet Miller White v. Michael J. Astrue

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1486
JANET MILLER WHITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:11-cv-400-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Janet Miller White, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa G. Smoller, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Janet Miller White appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny White supplemental
security income. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits
if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the
correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson
v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). We
have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. White v. Astrue, No. 3:11-cv-400-MOC-DSC
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --