The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1436•Debra I. Robertson v. Cree, Incorporated
12-1436Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1436
DEBRA I. ROBERTSON
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
CREE, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00507-H)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 20, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Debra I. Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard D. Haygood,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Debra I. Robertson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Robertson v. Cree, Inc., 5:10-cv-00507-H (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.