The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1393•Jennifer L. Wilson v. SUNTRUST BANK, Incorporated in Georgia
12-1393Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 13, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1393
JENNIFER L. WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK, Incorporated in Georgia; SUNTRUST MORTGAGE
INC.; RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, f/k/a Residential
Funding Corporation,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
HUTCHENS, SENTER, BRITTON, PA; JOHN/JANE DOE 1-10,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00580-FDW-DSC)
Submitted: July 30, 2012 Decided: August 13, 2012
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jennifer L. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Julia Bright Hartley,
Christina Rampey Hunoval, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH,
LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jennifer L. Wilson seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing her claims as to some, but not all, of
the Defendants in her civil action. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Wilson seeks
to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.