The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1389•Xuli Zhang v. Police S. Regan; Police Pec. M. Green
12-1389Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 18, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1389
XULI ZHANG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
POLICE S. REGAN; POLICE PEC. M. GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Theresa C. Buchanan,
Magistrate Judge. (1:10-cv-01329-TCB)
Submitted: July 10, 2012 Decided: July 18, 2012
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Karen L. Gibbons, COUNTY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Xuli Zhang appeals the magistrate judge’s order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to set aside the
magistrate judge’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s
order. See Zhang v. Regan, No. 1:10-cv-01329-TCB (E.D. Va.
Mar. 20, 2012). We deny Zhang’s motion for a remand. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to proceeding before a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.