The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1376•Tania Baker v. LOUIS E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; MARY ELLEN CAHILL, Intake Specialist; EVELYN YAP, LCSWC-C
12-1376Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1376
TANIA BAKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOUIS E. WOOLARD, LCSWC-C; MARY ELLEN CAHILL, Intake
Specialist; EVELYN YAP, LCSWC-C,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-02484-CCB)
Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012
Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tania Baker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tania Baker appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Baker v. Woolard, No. 1:11-cv-02484-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 7,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.