The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1375•Ralph T. Byrd v. Melvin G. Bergman
12-1375Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1375
RALPH T. BYRD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MELVIN G. BERGMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11-
cv-02086-RWT)
Submitted: August 21, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph T. Byrd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ralph T. Byrd appeals from the district court’s orders
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his complaint in which he
alleged legal malpractice, and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Byrd v. Bergman, No. 8:11-cv-02086-RWT
(D. Md. filed Feb. 15, 2012; entered Feb. 16, 2012 & Mar. 15,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* To the extent that Byrd also seeks to appeal the district
court’s imposition of $15,000 in sanctions, we decline to
address that order because the contempt proceedings are still
ongoing.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.