The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1313•Arthur Matthews Nowell v. TONY COOPER, Engineer Maintenance Supervisor (Professional Hospitality Resources)
12-1313Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1313
ARTHUR MATTHEWS NOWELL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TONY COOPER, Engineer Maintenance Supervisor (Professional
Hospitality Resources); MIAMI DAVIS, Assistant Engineer
Supervisor (Professional Hospitality Resources); DENA
CURRENT, Human Resource Manager (Professional Hospitality
Resources),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00015-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Matthews Nowell, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Berg Rafal,
WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Matthews Nowell appeals the district court’s
order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to
dismiss his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Nowell v. Cooper, No. 2:12-cv-
00015-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.