Pammalla Shannon Uplinger v. Rees Broome, P.c.

12-1289Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1289
PAMMALLA SHANNON UPLINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
REES BROOME, P.C.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325-
BFK)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pammalla Shannon Uplinger, Appellant Pro Se. Robert E. Draim,
Amanda Murray Schwartz, HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Pammalla Shannon Uplinger appeals the district court’s
order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary
judgment for Defendant in her action filed pursuant to the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant Uplinger’s motions to take
judicial notice and to supplement the record, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the lower courts. Uplinger v. Rees Broome,
P.C., Nos. 1:11-cv-01270-TSE-IDD; 09-13129-BFK; 10-01325-BFK
(E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.