The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1263•Carl Crews v. S&sservice Center Inc., trading as Woodbridge Public Auto Auction
12-1263Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 6, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1263
CARL CREWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
S&S SERVICE CENTER INC., trading as Woodbridge Public Auto
Auction,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-01184-JCC-TRJ)
Submitted: June 29, 2012 Decided: July 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Crews, Appellant Pro Se. James Douglas Cuthbertson,
LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Crews appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Federal Arbitration Act complaint for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Crews v. S&S Serv. Ctr.
Inc., No. 1:11-cv-01184-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.