The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1246•Juanita Nelson v. RONNIE HINMAN; LARRY TYLER; THE CRISFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT, Inc.; CHARLES CAVANAUGH
12-1246Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1246
JUANITA NELSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RONNIE HINMAN; LARRY TYLER; THE CRISFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT,
Inc.; CHARLES CAVANAUGH,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CITY OF CRISFIELD,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01816-BEL)
Submitted: August 8, 2012 Decided: August 23, 2012
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luke A. Rommel, OTWAY, RUSSO & ROMMEL, PC, Salisbury, Maryland,
for Appellant. Kevin B. Karpinski, Victoria M. Shearer,
KARPINSKI, COLARESI & KARP, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Juanita Nelson appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Nelson’s
claims of gender discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Nelson v. Hinman, No. 1:10-cv-01816-BEL (D. Md. Feb. 6,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.