The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1242•Derek N. Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Security
12-1242Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1242
DEREK N. JARVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONTRACTOR SECURITAS SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; ISIAH LEGGETT; MONTGOMERY
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-00654-AW)
Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 25, 2012
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Victor Arnold, James
A. Rothschild, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order
granting Contractor Securitas Security’s motion to dismiss and
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Contractor
Securitas Sec., No. 8:11-cv-00654-AW (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.