The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1222•Tyrone Hurt v. VINCENT GRAY, Mayor Elect; D. C. COUNCIL MEMBERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et. al.
12-1222Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 7, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1222
TYRONE HURT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
VINCENT GRAY, Mayor Elect; D. C. COUNCIL MEMBERS; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, et. al.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00020-RBS-FBS)
Submitted: May 29, 2012 Decided: June 7, 2012
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Hurt, Appellant Pro Se. James C. McKay, Jr., OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Hurt appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(8)(2)(B)(ii)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hurt v. Gray, No. 2:12-cv-00020-RBS-FBS (E.D.
Va. Jan. 26, 2012). We deny the motion for appointment of
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.