The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1207•Aslam Handy v. Ben Bernanke, trading as Federal Reserve Bank
12-1207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 8, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1207
ASLAM HANDY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BEN BERNANKE, trading as Federal Reserve Bank,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00672-HEH)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 8, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aslam Handy, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Facchina Mizusawa, BOARD
OF GOVERNORS, Washington, DC; Debra J. Prillaman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Aslam Handy appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil suit. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Handy v. Bernanke, No. 3:11-cv-
00672-HEH (E.D. Va., Jan. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.