The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1166•Carmen Ramos v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage; Wells Fargo Bank, Na
12-1166Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 24, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1166
CARMEN RAMOS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:11-cv-03130-AW)
Submitted: May 10, 2012 Decided: May 24, 2012
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carmen Ramos, Appellant Pro Se. Michael S. Barranco, TREANOR,
POPE & HUGHES, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carmen Ramos appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her claims arising from Wells Fargo Home Mortgage,
Inc.’s refusal to consider her loan modification application.
We have reviewed the district court’s order and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Ramos’s motion
to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Ramos v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc.,
No. 8:11-cv-03130-AW (D. Md. filed Jan. 26 & entered Jan. 27,
2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.