The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1162•Whitney Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
12-1162Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 21, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1162
WHITNEY LASSITER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Whitney Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman, Mark
Edward Warmbier, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying
her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington
Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan.
10, 2012). We grant Lassiter’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.