The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-1144•Wilhelmina Moore v. Williamsburg County School District
12-1144Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 23, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1144
WILHELMINA MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY
SCHOOL BOARD; RALPH FENNELL, JR., Superintendent; RUMELL
TAYLOR, Principal; BETTY R. MCKNIGHT; PEPPER RAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:08-cv-03800-TLW)
Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilhelmina Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown,
Carol Brittian Ervin, Brian Quisenberry, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS,
LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Helen Tyler McFadden, Cades,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wilhelmina Moore appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on her Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Moore v. Williamsburg Cnty. Sch. Dist., No.
4:08-cv-03800-TLW (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.