Charles W. Witt v. DR. CHAUNDRY, Director Medical

11-7740Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 3, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7740
CHARLES W. WITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. CHAUNDRY, Director Medical; RYAN ERWIN, Security
Officer; OFFICER ABDUSSLOAM, Security Officer,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STEPHEN M. HERRICK, Acting Director V.C.B.R.; CHAD HOUSER,
Director of Security; DUNCAN BENTON, Transportation Security
Officer,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-01164-LO-IDD)
Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Witt, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Fessier, TIMBERLAKE,
SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia; Rachel Joan Baer,
Allyson Kurzmann Tysinger, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

-- 1 of 3 --

2
VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Witt appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
granting summary judgment to Defendants. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Witt v. Chaundry, No.
1:10-cv-01164-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011). We deny Witt’s
motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.