The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7735•United States of America v. Brent Michael Green, a/k/a Big Bruce
11-7735Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 24, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7735
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRENT MICHAEL GREEN, a/k/a Big Bruce,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:03-cr-00016-FDW-4)
Submitted: May 14, 2012 Decided: May 24, 2012
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles R. Brewer, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brent Michael Green appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion seeking a reduction in sentence, 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), based on Amendment 750 to the U.S.
Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Green,
No. 3:03-cr-00016-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2011) We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.