The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7727•Blake McGrath v. Sergeant Spencer
11-7727Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7727
BLAKE MCGRATH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT SPENCER; UNKNOWN INTAKE SERGEANT #1; UNKNOWN INTAKE
SERGEANT #2; MR. SLOMON, Director of Polk Correctional
Institution,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03197-FL)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Blake McGrath, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Blake McGrath appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit against
state prison officials for the loss of some of his books. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because McGrath’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, McGrath has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We deny McGrath’s motions for transcript at
government expense and to amend/correct complaint. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.