The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7726•Victor Bernard Perkins v. G. Alan Dubois
11-7726Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7726
VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
G. ALAN DUBOIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03087-D)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s
order dismissing as frivolous and for failure to state a claim
his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Perkins v. DuBois, No. 5:11-ct-03087-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.