The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7719•Dexter Antonio Sheppard v. Warden Tim Riley; Sgt. Derrick McBryar
11-7719Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7719
DEXTER ANTONIO SHEPPARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN TIM RILEY; SGT. DERRICK MCBRYAR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-02424-CMC)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dexter Antonio Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes
Burton, GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dexter Antonio Sheppard appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sheppard v. Riley, No. 1:10-cv-02424-CMC (D.S.C. Nov.
29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.