The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7662•United States of America v. Patrick Floyd Wilson, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown
11-7662Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7662
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PATRICK FLOYD WILSON, a/k/a Little Patrick, a/k/a Anthony
Wilson, a/k/a Anthony Brown,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:96-cr-30056-MFU-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Floyd Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy J. Heaphy,
United States Attorney, Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Floyd Wilson appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion to correct a
clerical error in the judgment issued following his
resentencing. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 5:96-cr-
30056-MFU-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.