The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7645•United States of America v. NORWOOD WALLACE BARBER, JR., a/k/a Pee Wee Barber
11-7645Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 5, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7645
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NORWOOD WALLACE BARBER, JR., a/k/a Pee Wee Barber,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson,
District Judge. (5:05-cr-00015-SGW-RSB-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A.
Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of
sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Barber, No. 5:05-cr-00015-SGW-RSB-1 (W.D. Va. filed
Nov. 3 & entered Nov. 7, 2011). We further deny Barber’s motion
for disposition hearing. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.