The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7644•United States of America v. Derrick Johnson, a/k/a Big D
11-7644Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7644
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERRICK JOHNSON, a/k/a Big D,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:08-cr-00155-CMC-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derrick Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derrick Johnson appeals a district court order denying his
motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not
lower Johnson’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district did
not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v.
Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.