The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7620•United States of America v. Tyrone F. Webb
11-7620Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7620
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE F. WEBB,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:93-cr-0007-CMC-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone F. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes,
Assistant United States Attorney, James Chris Leventis, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone F. Webb appeals a district court order denying
his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
Because the amendment in question did not lower Webb’s
Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its
discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357
F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.