The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7533•United States of America v. Paul George Kratsas, a/k/a P. J. Kratsas
11-7533Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7533
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
PAUL GEORGE KRATSAS, a/k/a P. J. Kratsas,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (1:92-cr-00208-DKC-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul George Kratsas, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul George Kratsas appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct judgment under Fed. R. Crim. P.
36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Kratsas, No. 1:92-cr-00208-DKC-1
(D. Md. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.