The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7515•Frederick Lawrence Washington v. State of North Carolina
11-7515Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 9, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7515
FREDERICK LAWRENCE WASHINGTON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:09-hc-02068-D)
Submitted: March 26, 2012 Decided: April 9, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Lawrence Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Lawrence Washington appeals the district
court’s order denying his motions to reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Washington v. North Carolina, No. 5:09-hc-02068-D (E.D.N.C.
May 3 & Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.