The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7504•Charles R. Turner v. GENE JOHNSON, Director of Prisons
11-7504Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7504
CHARLES R. TURNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON, Director of Prisons; KIMBERLY RUNION,
Director of V.C.B.R.; THE C.R.C. COMMITTEE, Names Unknown,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:11-cv-01086-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles R. Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles R. Turner appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Turner v. Johnson, No. 1:11-cv-01086-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va.
Oct. 21, 2011). See Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136,
1139-40 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477
(1994), applies to civilly committed sex offenders). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.