The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7489•Lawrence Adrain Coxson v. Jeffrey Shank, McTc; Marvin Metz, McTc; Unknown Officer; Attorney General
11-7489Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7489
LAWRENCE ADRAIN COXSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY SHANK, MCTC; MARVIN METZ, MCTC; UNKNOWN OFFICER;
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RAKESH MALIK, Dr.; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-
cv-01976-RWT)
Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 28, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Adrain Coxson, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah W. Rice,
Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Adrain Coxson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Coxson’s
informal brief raises no issues challenging the district court’s
disposition, Coxson has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.