The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7472•Joe Faulks v. DEPUTY GUILMARTIN, Sergeant; DEPUTY COX, Corporal; DEPUTY KIDD, Hearing Officer
11-7472Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7472
JOE FAULKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY GUILMARTIN, Sergeant; DEPUTY COX, Corporal; DEPUTY
KIDD, Hearing Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00551-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Faulks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Faulks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Faulks v. Guilmartin, No. 2:11-cv-00551-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct.
19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.