The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7470•Howell W. Woltz, Tep v. Fci Beckley
11-7470Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 3, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7470
HOWELL W. WOLTZ, TEP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FCI BECKLEY; FPC BECKLEY; JOHN GRIMES, Counselor; BEVERLY
SMITH, Case Manager; JAMES CHILDRESS, Case & Unit Manager;
M. LEWIS, Unit Secretary; GARY LOCKE, Secretary of the
United States Department of Commerce,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00487)
Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz, TEP, appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006) his complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. FCI
Beckley, No. 5:10-cv-00487 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 17, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.