Andres Javier Sanchez v. Dominic McLain; Roger Edwards

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7468
ANDRES JAVIER SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOMINIC MCLAIN; ROGER EDWARDS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CHARLES FELTS, Warden; KEVIN THOMPSON; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL
WATTS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Thomas E. Johnston,
District Judge. (5:07-cv-00355)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: April 4, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andres Javier Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se. J. Christopher
Krivonyak, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Andres Javier Sanchez appeals from the district
court’s amended judgment order denying his summary judgment
motions, denying Defendants’ motion in limine as moot, and
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,
for summary judgment, on his claims against them, which the
district court construed as claims brought pursuant to Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A.
§§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s amended judgment order. See Sanchez v. McLain,
No. 5:07-cv-00355 (S.D. W. Va. Oct. 6, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --