The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7465•Cleaven L. Williams, Jr. v. Warden Merritt
11-7465Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7465
CLEAVEN L. WILLIAMS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN MERRITT; BARTEE, Assistant Warden; OFFICER YOUNG;
SERGEANT CALVIN WILLIAMS; OFFICER LARYEA; OFFICER SAUNDERS;
MARIA JOHNSON; NURSE JANE DOE; FLORENCE FOSTER, Inmate
Grievance Coordinator; MR. COLEY; KRUMP, Chief of Security;
DR. JOHN DOE, University of Md Shock Trauma; C.O. CRAIG
WILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-00935-CCB)
Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 19, 2012
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleaven L. Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eugene
Hoffman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cleaven L. Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by
the district court. Williams v. Merritt, No. 1:10-cv-00935-CCB
(D. Md. Mar. 28, 2011; Jul. 14, 2011).∗ We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Claim V on the
ground that Williams failed to offer any evidence, apart from
his own bald and conclusory allegations, to support his claims.
See Erwin v. United States, 591 F.3d 313, 319-20 (4th Cir. 2010)
(noting that mere conclusory allegations are insufficient to
support the nonmoving party’s case).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.