The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7425•Charles W. Walker, Sr. v. MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill
11-7425Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7425
CHARLES W. WALKER, SR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MILDRED RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(3:10-cv-02464-RMG)
Submitted: February 22, 2012 Decided: March 1, 2012
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Walker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Walker, Sr. appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 &
Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Walker v. Rivera, No. 3:10-cv-02464-
RMG (D.S.C. filed Sept. 26, 2011; entered Sept. 27, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.