The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7370•James Meshach Lomax v. BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; THE REDUCTION IN VIOLENCE COMMITTEE
11-7370Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7370
JAMES MESHACH LOMAX,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden; THE REDUCTION IN VIOLENCE COMMITTEE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-02708-DKC)
Submitted: February 27, 2012 Decided: March 1, 2012
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Meshach Lomax, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Shearin, No.
8:09-cv-02708-DKC (D. Md. May 9 & Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.