The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7360•Stanley Preston Polite v. JONATHAN CHAPLIN, Lawyer SC Bar 8706
11-7360Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7360
STANLEY PRESTON POLITE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JONATHAN CHAPLIN, Lawyer SC Bar 8706,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-02072-CMC)
Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Preston Polite, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Polite seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for failure to
state a claim on which relief could be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s judgment. Polite v. Chaplin, No.
3:11-cv-02072-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.