The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7338•Gregory Lynn Gordon v. BRIAN CLAYTON HUNCKE, Detective
11-7338Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7338
GREGORY LYNN GORDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRIAN CLAYTON HUNCKE, Detective; BRIAN WAYNE KEZIAH,
Detective; EDDIE CATHEY, Sheriff; UNION COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE; MILES HELMS, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00257-RJC)
Submitted: January 12, 2012 Decided: January 18, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Lynn Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. William L. Hill, James
Demarest Secor, III, FRAZIER HILL & FURY, RLLP, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Lynn Gordon appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action for failure to
state a claim after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) review.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gordon v. Huncke, No. 3:11-cv-00257-RJC (W.D.N.C. Sept.
28, 2011). We also deny all pending motions. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.