The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7293•Michael A. Loiseau v. HOUSTON NORRIS, Lieutenant, Shift Watcher, Rappahannock Regional Jail
11-7293Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7293
MICHAEL A. LOISEAU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOUSTON NORRIS, Lieutenant, Shift Watcher, Rappahannock
Regional Jail,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00870-REP)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Angelo Loiseau, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael A. Loiseau appeals the district court’s order
adopting the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge’s
report and recommendation and dismissing Loiseau’s civil rights
action for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Because Loiseau’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Loiseau has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.