The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7282•Marcello B. Parks, Sr. v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden
11-7282Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 2, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7282
MARCELLO B. PARKS, SR.
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-01217-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcello Brian Parks, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Yiris E. Cornwall,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marcello Brian Parks, Sr., a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Parks v. Stansberry,
No. 1:10-cv-01217-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 2011). We deny
Parks’ motion for a transcript at government expense and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.