William E. Alton v. Maryland Department of Public Safety

11-7272Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 24, 2012

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7272
WILLIAM E. ALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL
SERVICES, et al.; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden Eastern Corr.
Inst.; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden Western Corr. Inst.; B.
MCKENZIE, C.O.2; G. WILSON, C.O.2; R. A. BEEMAN, C.O.2; S.
A. WILSON, C.O.2; S. SHAVER, C.O.; WHITESIDE, Lt.; F.
WILHELM, C.O.2; JEFFREY KESSLER, C.O.2; J. P. MORGAN, Assist
Warden; H. B. MURPHY; BEAL, C.O.2; CARDER, C.O.S; C.
MCKENZIE, Lt.; LT. FRIEND, et al. Defendants in their
individual and official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:09-cv-01311-WMN)
Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 24, 2012
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William E. Alton, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane
Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
William E. Alton appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Alton v. Md. Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No.
1:09-cv-01311-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.