The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7127•Myles Spires v. Lieutenant Harbaugh; Officer Crowe
11-7127Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2012
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7127
MYLES SPIRES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT HARBAUGH; OFFICER CROWE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-01597-RDB)
Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 13, 2012
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Myles Spires, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Myles Spires appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying his motions for appointment of counsel and to supplement
the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Spires v. Harbaugh, No. 1:10-cv-01597-
RDB (D. Md. filed Aug. 5, 2011; entered Aug. 8, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.