The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7085•United States of America v. Paramena J. Shikanda, a/k/a Joseph Shikanda
11-7085Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7085
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PARAMENA J. SHIKANDA, a/k/a Joseph Shikanda,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cr-00251-3)
Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paramena J. Shikanda, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Loew, Susan M.
Robinson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Betty Adkins
Pullin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Paramena J. Shikanda appeals the district court’s
order denying his self-styled motion for sentence adjustment and
has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Shikanda’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the
district court’s order. United States v. Shikanda, No. 2:09-cr-
00251-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.