The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-7051•United States of America v. RONNIE EDWARD BANNER, JR., a/k/a Ronnie Edward Banner, a/k/a Pellar
11-7051Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONNIE EDWARD BANNER, JR., a/k/a Ronnie Edward Banner, a/k/a
Pellar,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00047-RLV-8)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Edward Banner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Edward Banner, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying Banner’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion to
reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Banner, No. 5:00-cr-
00047-RLV-8 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.