The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6964•Larry D. Reaves v. Claim Regional Office Fiduciary - D.c. Office; Jose Riveo
11-6964Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6964
LARRY D. REAVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CLAIM REGIONAL OFFICE FIDUCIARY – D.C. OFFICE; JOSE RIVEO,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00620-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry D. Reaves, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry D. Reaves appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. Reaves’
opening appellate brief is incoherent and fails to conform to
any of the requirements of Fourth Circuit Local Rule 34(b). By
failing to raise any issues for appeal, Reaves has abandoned all
appellate claims. See, e.g., Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178
F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.