The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6959•Romaine Francis v. C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the City of Richmond
11-6959Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6959
ROMAINE FRANCIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the
City of Richmond; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF
RICHMOND; ANDERSON, Medical Worker; ROBERTSON, Captain of
the City of Richmond Sheriff's Department,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
STANLEY NELSON FURMAN, Doctor,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:09-cv-00235-REP)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William
Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Romaine Francis appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No.
3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.