The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6934•Anthony Leon Hoover v. Beverly Eaves Perdue; Alvin W. Keller, Jr.; Robert C. Lewis; Faye E. Daniels; Roy Cooper
11-6934Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6934
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
CHARLES MARSHALL,
Plaintiff,
v.
BEVERLY EAVES PERDUE; ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.; ROBERT C.
LEWIS; FAYE E. DANIELS; ROY COOPER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03068-F)
Submitted: November 18, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as frivolous.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hoover v. Perdue, No. 5:11-ct-03068-F (E.D.N.C. July 11,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.