The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6918•Charles Everette Hinton v. Linda Lopez; Andrew Murray; Christian Hoel; John Doe; John Doe 2; William Robert Bell
11-6918Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6918
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LINDA LOPEZ; ANDREW MURRAY; CHRISTIAN HOEL; JOHN DOE; JOHN
DOE 2; WILLIAM ROBERT BELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00316-RJC)
Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Everette Hinton appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hinton v. Lopez, No. 3:11-cv-00316-RJC (W.D.N.C. July 6, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.