The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6868•Gregory D. Crosby v. M. HAMILTON, Senior Officer Specialist; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
11-6868Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6868
GREGORY D. CROSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. HAMILTON, Senior Officer Specialist; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
PRISONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cv-00181-JLK)
Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory D. Crosby, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory D. Crosby appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971) for failure to pay the filing fee. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby
v. Hamilton, No. 7:11-cv-00181-JLK (W.D. Va. June 28, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* As the district court noted, Crosby is free to refile upon
payment of the filing fee or production of the documentation
needed to proceed in forma pauperis.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.