The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6864•Alejandro Dejesus Hernandez v. THOMAS B. KENNEDY, (DEA) Alexandria Police Department
11-6864Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6864
ALEJANDRO DEJESUS HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS B. KENNEDY, (DEA) Alexandria Police Department;
ALEXANDRIA CITY HALL, Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-00029-MSD-FBS)
Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alejandro Dejesus Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alejandro Dejesus Hernandez appeals the district
court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his civil rights
complaint and denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hernandez v.
Kennedy, No. 2:11-cv-00029-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2011; May
25, 2011). We deny Hernandez’ motion for summary reversal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.