The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-6862•United States of America v. Nigel Nicholas Douglas, a/k/a Junior
11-6862Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6862
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NIGEL NICHOLAS DOUGLAS, a/k/a Junior,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00131-HCM-7)
Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 23, 2011
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nigel Nicholas Douglas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael
Comstock, Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States
Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nigel Nicholas Douglas appeals the district court’s
order dismissing what it construed as a duplicate of his initial
18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2011) motion for
sentence modification. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See United States v. Douglas, No. 2:93-cr-00131-HCM-7
(E.D. Va. May 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.